Credibility Inspector

This is the interactive UofA Credibility Inspector. Upload your model-credibility evidence and, in a few minutes, get one of two views off the same analysis: a plain-language Reviewer verdict for someone deciding whether to trust a finished package, or the Author (Gap-Finder) gap list for whoever is assembling the evidence. The summary is indicative, not a formal acceptance decision.

Privacy

Your documents are read privately inside the Space. Nothing is stored or sent to a third party. The first analysis after the Space wakes can take a few minutes while the model loads.

Steps

1. Upload and detect. Drop your evidence documents, or try the bundled sample, then let the router detect the standard.
2. Confirm the standard. The router picks one from what it read. Switch it if it guessed wrong.
3. Confirm what we understood. The tool shows the credibility factors it read from your evidence. Correct any status it got wrong. That is the only thing you need to touch.
4. Read the result. You land on the Reviewer view (plain-language: what the model was for, what is evidenced, what is missing, the concerns that fired). Toggle to the Author view for the engineer’s gap list, or Save as PDF.

⏳ First load can take up to a minute. The demo runs on a GPU that sleeps when idle to keep costs down. On a cold start you may see a "Building" or "Starting" screen below while it wakes, then the app appears. You can also open the demo in its own tab.

↻ Reload the demo

What it measures, and what it does not

The Credibility Inspector surfaces completeness and weakeners in plain terms. It does not issue an acceptance decision and it does not attest your model. For a per-factor write-up or a credibility-assessment consult, leave your email at the end.

Prefer the command line, or want the FDA-co-authored NAFEMS worked example with exact numbers? See the NAFEMS CLI reproduction.