{
  "id": "https://uofa.net/iso42001/hybrid/cou2/decision",
  "type": "DecisionRecord",
  "actor": "https://uofa.net/iso42001/hybrid/cou2/person/aims-owner",
  "role": "AIMS owner",
  "outcome": "Conditionally Accepted (pending closure of OOS-flagged evidence gaps)",
  "rationale": "AIMS evidence is structurally complete but several C3 weakeners and OOS bundle-sufficiency gaps fire substantively at this assurance level. Unlike COU1, the OOS firings here are NOT contextualized as appropriate-for-Low-risk — high-risk AI demands independent verification, stakeholder validation, expert RCA review, methodology validation. The OOS firings name the specific evidence gaps the organization needs to close before the AIMS evidence is sufficient for a high-risk deployment claim.",
  "decidedAt": "2026-05-06T00:00:00Z"
}